Understanding the Fundamental Attribution Error in Couple Therapy: Seeing Each Other More Clearly
- Seyedmohammad Kalantar
- May 10, 2025
- 6 min read

Discover how understanding the Fundamental Attribution Error can transform communication and strengthen connection in couple therapy. Learn to see your partner with greater clarity and compassion. Have we been misunderstanding each other without even realizing it?
Why do I sometimes assume the worst about my partner—but give myself the benefit of the doubt?
Why do small conflicts feel bigger over time—and harder to repair?
Could the way I interpret my partner’s behavior be part of the problem?
Is it possible we’re stuck in a pattern—not because we don’t love each other, but because we don’t see each other clearly anymore?
What if there’s a simple shift in perspective that could change the way we connect?
In relationships—particularly long-term ones such as marriage or committed partnerships—it’s easy to fall into the idea that we “know” our partner entirely. We become familiar with their routines, reactions, preferences, and even the tone they use when they’re upset or tired. This intimacy, while comforting, can create hidden distortions in how we perceive and interpret each other’s behavior. One of the most common psychological distortions that shows up in couple therapy is something called the Fundamental Attribution Error.
What Is the Fundamental Attribution Error?
The Fundamental Attribution Error (FAE) refers to our tendency to overemphasize personality-based explanations for others’ behavior while underestimating the influence of situational factors. This concept was first introduced by Lee Ross, a social psychologist, in 1977. Ross noted that people often attribute others' actions to internal character traits even when there is clear evidence of external influences.
At the same time, we tend to explain our own behaviors in terms of circumstances or external pressures. In the realm of relationships, this creates a skewed lens through which we view our partner’s actions.
In couple dynamics, this might sound like:
“She’s always late because she’s disorganized.”
“He didn’t call because he doesn’t care.”
“They never help out because they’re selfish.”
“She overreacts because she’s dramatic.”
But when it’s our behavior, the explanation changes:
“Traffic was terrible.”
“I had too many things on my mind.”
“I didn’t call because I was drained after work.”
“I forgot because I’ve been overwhelmed lately.”
This double standard can become toxic over time. Our partner’s behaviors are treated as stable traits, while ours are flexible responses to life’s pressures. This imbalance can slowly erode empathy, trust, and connection.
Why It Matters in Couple Therapy
When couples seek therapy, it’s rarely just about surface-level disagreements. Beneath issues like housework, parenting, or intimacy are emotional wounds—feelings of being misunderstood, unappreciated, or unloved. The attribution error often lies at the heart of these disconnections.
A partner may think:
“He never listens because he’s selfish.”
“She avoids conflict because she doesn’t care.”
“I do all the emotional work in this relationship.”
Such beliefs don’t allow for exploration. They dismiss nuance and reduce complex relational dynamics to moral judgments. When this happens, defensiveness rises, empathy fades, and both partners become trapped in repetitive, emotionally charged cycles.
The Cost of Misattribution
These misattributions often become habitual. The more we rely on them, the harder it becomes to access compassion or see alternate explanations. Over time, this leads to:
Increased emotional reactivity
Persistent feelings of unfairness or imbalance
Conflict escalation or emotional withdrawal
Difficulty repairing ruptures
Partners begin to respond to each other not in real-time, but through pre-formed interpretations shaped by attribution errors. Therapy, therefore, becomes an invitation to pause and reframe—to slow down automatic assumptions and build a bridge to better understanding.
From Judgment to Curiosity: The Systemic Frame
In couple therapy, we introduce a systemic approach. Instead of focusing on “who’s right or wrong,” we ask:
“What patterns are we stuck in together?”“What system are we both a part of that shapes how we see and treat each other?”
We help couples:
Suspend judgment long enough to listen
Shift from reaction to reflection
Get curious about each other’s emotional world
Understand that many behaviors are protective strategies—not personality flaws
Systemic therapy acknowledges that behaviors are relational—not just personal. We don’t exist in isolation; we act, react, and adapt based on how we feel seen, valued, or threatened in the relationship.
John Gottman’s Research: The Antidotes to Attribution Error
This approach aligns beautifully with the work of renowned couple therapist Dr. John Gottman, whose research over the past four decades has transformed how we understand successful relationships. Gottman’s studies—especially his “Love Lab” observations—highlight the importance of emotional bids, repair attempts, and soft start-ups.
Gottman doesn’t speak about the Fundamental Attribution Error by name, but his principles directly address its consequences. In particular:
Positive Sentiment Override (PSO):
Couples who maintain an overall positive view of their partner are less likely to fall into negative attribution traps. They give each other the benefit of the doubt and interpret behavior in a more forgiving light.
Turning Toward Bids for Connection:
Instead of assuming disinterest or selfishness, successful couples notice small gestures of connection—even subtle ones—and respond positively.
The “Four Horsemen” and Their Antidotes:
Criticism often stems from attribution error (e.g., “You’re so lazy”). Gottman’s antidote is to use gentle start-up and speak from emotion rather than accusation.
Defensiveness is often a response to feeling unfairly blamed.
Stonewalling can arise when misattribution leads to chronic tension.
Contempt, the most dangerous, grows from years of hostile interpretation.
The antidote to these “horsemen” lies in expressing needs clearly, responding with appreciation, and rebuilding emotional safety.
The “Repair Attempt” Strategy:
Even when conflict arises, couples who can interrupt negative cycles with humor, touch, or vulnerable expression are more likely to repair and reconnect.
These practices mirror the corrective to attribution error: replacing assumptions with clarity, judgments with emotions, and blame with inquiry.
Going Beyond Curiosity: Entering the Unknown Together
Curiosity opens the door, but connection deepens when we walk through it together. This means making space for our partner’s lived experience—even when it challenges our assumptions.
Ask:
“What do I not know about what you’re feeling?”
“Is it possible there’s more going on than I assumed?”
“How might I be misunderstanding your intention?”
Couples who move from “I know who you are” to “I want to understand you again” rediscover each other not just as partners, but as evolving people.
The Role of Vulnerability
Vulnerability is not about weakness. It’s about honesty. It means saying:
“I didn’t know how to ask for comfort, so I criticized instead.”
“When you didn’t text back, I told myself I don’t matter.”
“I wasn’t ignoring you. I was overwhelmed.”
These statements are bridges—not walls. And when partners meet vulnerability with empathy, trust is rebuilt. It’s not about being perfect; it’s about being real.
Learning Each Other’s Emotional System
In therapy, we explore:
Each person brings to the relationship a system of expectations, stress responses, attachment needs, cultural values, and emotional wounds. Living together doesn’t mean knowing these systems—it means we continually learn them.
What triggers each person and why?
How did their upbringing shape their emotional responses?
What role do gender, culture, or trauma play in how they express needs?
What does love, respect, and repair mean to them?
Attribution errors dissolve when we see our partner not as a character in our story, but as the author of their own.
Conclusion: From Blame to Understanding, From Pattern to Possibility
Couple therapy isn’t about deciding who’s right. It’s about learning how to relate better. It’s about moving past misattributions and seeing the full human complexity of the person across from us.
The Fundamental Attribution Error—coined by Lee Ross—reminds us that our brains take shortcuts. But love asks for more than shortcuts. It asks for presence, humility, and the willingness to look again with new eyes.
Whether you're using Gottman’s repair strategies, systemic reframing, or simply practicing daily curiosity, the goal is the same: to move from misunderstanding to connection.
Ready to Learn More?
If you're curious about how these patterns may be shaping your relationship—or if you're ready to explore new ways of relating—I invite you to reach out.
As a Registered Clinical Counsellor, I offer both individual and couple therapy, virtually and in person, serving clients across Vancouver, Downtown Vancouver, and the Tri-Cities, including Port Coquitlam, Coquitlam, and Port Moody.
My practice offers a warm, inclusive, and respectful space for all couples. I affirm diverse identities, orientations, and relationship structures, and I am committed to creating a safe and supportive environment where your lived experiences are honoured.
I , here in Kalantar Counselling, also support clients navigating trauma, anxiety, or relational challenges following motor vehicle accidents, and I accept ICBC-funded counselling for eligible individuals.
Whether you're starting therapy for the first time or returning with new insight, I’m here to support you with care, clarity, and compassion.
Let’s explore together how you can move beyond misunderstanding, break old patterns, and rebuild connection with empathy, trust, and dignity—right here in British Columbia.




Comments